<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Atlanta Water Shortage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com</link>
	<description>Keeping you informed about the Georgia drought.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by RichS</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>RichS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>Kathleen - Other businesses directly effected - nurseries, car washes, swimming pool sales, pressure washers, boat sales, lakeside businesses that cater to the recreational crowd, probably lots more I'm not thinking of.  

Industries that use water for their processes are not generally restricted, but I believe most are working to conserve water without having to cut back production and lay workers off.  

Price increases might be an incentive for them to cut back more.  That would be the free market solution.  Water is in short supply - raise the price.  Of course we would have to find a way to bill Florida and Alabama for all the Georgia rain we send to them.  Maybe they would quit whining for more if it wasn't free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen - Other businesses directly effected - nurseries, car washes, swimming pool sales, pressure washers, boat sales, lakeside businesses that cater to the recreational crowd, probably lots more I&#8217;m not thinking of.  </p>
<p>Industries that use water for their processes are not generally restricted, but I believe most are working to conserve water without having to cut back production and lay workers off.  </p>
<p>Price increases might be an incentive for them to cut back more.  That would be the free market solution.  Water is in short supply - raise the price.  Of course we would have to find a way to bill Florida and Alabama for all the Georgia rain we send to them.  Maybe they would quit whining for more if it wasn&#8217;t free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Andrew S.</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>Hi Kathleen,

I found &lt;a href="http://www.wsbtv.com/news/14369378/detail.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; web-site that shows some of the watering restrictions from last November.  You'll notice most commercial activites are exempt from the watering restrictions.  Car washes in particular use about 1% of the total water consumed in Atlanta.  This doesn't sound like much, but it's a lot considering that counties were struggling to reduce their water usage by 10%.  I do know that the car washes were required to reclaim some of their water or face a hefty fine and Coca Cola had (is?) made some efficiency gains to reduce the amount of water they used in their bottling plants but I couldn't tell you how much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kathleen,</p>
<p>I found <a href="http://www.wsbtv.com/news/14369378/detail.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> web-site that shows some of the watering restrictions from last November.  You&#8217;ll notice most commercial activites are exempt from the watering restrictions.  Car washes in particular use about 1% of the total water consumed in Atlanta.  This doesn&#8217;t sound like much, but it&#8217;s a lot considering that counties were struggling to reduce their water usage by 10%.  I do know that the car washes were required to reclaim some of their water or face a hefty fine and Coca Cola had (is?) made some efficiency gains to reduce the amount of water they used in their bottling plants but I couldn&#8217;t tell you how much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Chicken Little</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>McCain sez' Lanier will be back to full pool by 2013

BGAAAAWWKKKKKKKK!K!KK!K!K!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain sez&#8217; Lanier will be back to full pool by 2013</p>
<p>BGAAAAWWKKKKKKKK!K!KK!K!K!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>I'm curious about the businesses affected by the water situation down there (hailing from the north-east). A news search says that it has (obviously) impacted power companies, landscapers and water parks, but what bottling companies? There's a lot of beverage companies operating in Georgia. Does anyone regulate their use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about the businesses affected by the water situation down there (hailing from the north-east). A news search says that it has (obviously) impacted power companies, landscapers and water parks, but what bottling companies? There&#8217;s a lot of beverage companies operating in Georgia. Does anyone regulate their use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Andrew S.</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>We're at 1057.67 today (May 15th), which is the highest the lake has been this year.  There's thunderstorms likely today, and less likely tomorrow and later this week.  How long can it last?  I couldn't find out much information about scheduled releases on the hot-line, only that there's none for today and they don't know about upcoming ones.  

Maybe May will be flat or with little draw down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re at 1057.67 today (May 15th), which is the highest the lake has been this year.  There&#8217;s thunderstorms likely today, and less likely tomorrow and later this week.  How long can it last?  I couldn&#8217;t find out much information about scheduled releases on the hot-line, only that there&#8217;s none for today and they don&#8217;t know about upcoming ones.  </p>
<p>Maybe May will be flat or with little draw down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by rkolter</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>rkolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>You can have our rain.  Jeez.  St. Louis is drowning.  Trees are actually uprooting because the ground is turning to mud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have our rain.  Jeez.  St. Louis is drowning.  Trees are actually uprooting because the ground is turning to mud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Josh May</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>By the way, holding steady month to date, and with rain in the forecast is excellent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, holding steady month to date, and with rain in the forecast is excellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Josh May</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>The problem with promulgating the doomsday scenario is that when it doesn't come to pass, people feel as though they were misled. I know that's not really true, but that's the way they feel. There are lots of really good reasons to manage the available water much more carefully, to conserve the resource available as much as possible all along the way in order to make future economic activity possible. 

I feel that rational analysis is the best policy, and while the "tail risks" - the low probability high impact disaster scenario is worthy of exploration, to use it as the driver of public policy is an unstable way to put across a message. I know that our media don't like to do it any other way, but I still think that the base case - that water conservation and planning is necessary, is the more honest message to have as the main point of public communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with promulgating the doomsday scenario is that when it doesn&#8217;t come to pass, people feel as though they were misled. I know that&#8217;s not really true, but that&#8217;s the way they feel. There are lots of really good reasons to manage the available water much more carefully, to conserve the resource available as much as possible all along the way in order to make future economic activity possible. </p>
<p>I feel that rational analysis is the best policy, and while the &#8220;tail risks&#8221; - the low probability high impact disaster scenario is worthy of exploration, to use it as the driver of public policy is an unstable way to put across a message. I know that our media don&#8217;t like to do it any other way, but I still think that the base case - that water conservation and planning is necessary, is the more honest message to have as the main point of public communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by rkolter</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>rkolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>I dislike the concept that the doomsday scenario is somehow unlikely.  It is only unlikely NOW.  Had waterflow from Buford Dam not been restricted and allowed to flow like it had during the early part of the drought (and in non-drought years) and had people not conserved, the lake would be much lower. 

And deadpool, while not such a huge concern after all for Buford Dam, IS a big concern to municipalities with water pipes going into the lake - many of which were close to uncovered by the low point last year, and which would have been left hanging in the air if we'd gone much lower.

Unlikely?  Only because at the very last minute people woke up and did something.  Still unlikely?  well... let's see how this year goes before we say that.  Dropping 20 feet from this point would be a pretty significant hardship on the area, even if you still would have water coming out of your tap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dislike the concept that the doomsday scenario is somehow unlikely.  It is only unlikely NOW.  Had waterflow from Buford Dam not been restricted and allowed to flow like it had during the early part of the drought (and in non-drought years) and had people not conserved, the lake would be much lower. </p>
<p>And deadpool, while not such a huge concern after all for Buford Dam, IS a big concern to municipalities with water pipes going into the lake - many of which were close to uncovered by the low point last year, and which would have been left hanging in the air if we&#8217;d gone much lower.</p>
<p>Unlikely?  Only because at the very last minute people woke up and did something.  Still unlikely?  well&#8230; let&#8217;s see how this year goes before we say that.  Dropping 20 feet from this point would be a pretty significant hardship on the area, even if you still would have water coming out of your tap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monthly status update on Lake Lanier by Chicken Little</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080501/monthly-status-update-on-lake-lanier/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=257#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>material things don't matter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>material things don&#8217;t matter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
