<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inflow to Lanier reaching record lows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/</link>
	<description>Keeping you informed about the Georgia drought.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew S.</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>I'm working on the assumption that the immediate drought is due to the El Nino/La Nina SST oscillation that usually lasts about two years.  Also,  by November and December I meant that then is when then lake stops declining, I didn't mean that it refilled completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on the assumption that the immediate drought is due to the El Nino/La Nina SST oscillation that usually lasts about two years.  Also,  by November and December I meant that then is when then lake stops declining, I didn&#8217;t mean that it refilled completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkolter</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>rkolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>I do not include surface area as a function of depth profile.  This means that my predictions are always optimistic.  With a constant outflow, the surface area of the lake will decline, leading to faster drops in depth as the lake drains.  I have a chart covering that based on the way the lake filled - it closely match the ACE predictions on the decline in water depth that are based on surface area.

For the next six feet of depth though, we have a good idea what will happen to the surface area, and the loss of surface area means less.  The first real precipitous(sp) drop-off should be in the high 1040's.  That's when the lake started to really flood surface area as it filled, and when it will really withdraw quickly as it drains.

A far more accurate predictor overall is the volume predictor.

As for it refilling in November and December... it only does that when it's not in a drought... it sure didn't fill back up last year during those months.  Forget that tropical storm stuff.  Get a bucket brigade going - St. Louis would be thrilled to death to give you a few billion gallons right about now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not include surface area as a function of depth profile.  This means that my predictions are always optimistic.  With a constant outflow, the surface area of the lake will decline, leading to faster drops in depth as the lake drains.  I have a chart covering that based on the way the lake filled - it closely match the ACE predictions on the decline in water depth that are based on surface area.</p>
<p>For the next six feet of depth though, we have a good idea what will happen to the surface area, and the loss of surface area means less.  The first real precipitous(sp) drop-off should be in the high 1040&#8217;s.  That&#8217;s when the lake started to really flood surface area as it filled, and when it will really withdraw quickly as it drains.</p>
<p>A far more accurate predictor overall is the volume predictor.</p>
<p>As for it refilling in November and December&#8230; it only does that when it&#8217;s not in a drought&#8230; it sure didn&#8217;t fill back up last year during those months.  Forget that tropical storm stuff.  Get a bucket brigade going - St. Louis would be thrilled to death to give you a few billion gallons right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew S.</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3662</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3662</guid>
		<description>The Lake starts filling up November or December so it's touch and go so far, unless we get that big tropical storm of course.  :)  rkolter, remind me again, are you included a surface area as a function of depth profile, or assuming it's constant?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lake starts filling up November or December so it&#8217;s touch and go so far, unless we get that big tropical storm of course.  <img src='http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  rkolter, remind me again, are you included a surface area as a function of depth profile, or assuming it&#8217;s constant?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkolter</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>rkolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>I'll update the predictions page at the end of June.  With less than 30 days data, a single day can make a big difference.  For example, NOW june so far:

Average loss of 0.0379 feet/day
Total loss of 0.72 feet

Average loss of 1.26 thousand acre-feeet of storage/day
Total loss of 24 thousand acre-feet of storage.

We're 6.15 feet above the low point from last year.  At this rate of average loss, it would take 162 days (11/28/2008) to reach that point this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll update the predictions page at the end of June.  With less than 30 days data, a single day can make a big difference.  For example, NOW june so far:</p>
<p>Average loss of 0.0379 feet/day<br />
Total loss of 0.72 feet</p>
<p>Average loss of 1.26 thousand acre-feeet of storage/day<br />
Total loss of 24 thousand acre-feet of storage.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re 6.15 feet above the low point from last year.  At this rate of average loss, it would take 162 days (11/28/2008) to reach that point this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicken Little</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>200 days?

We're -146 days from dead pool already!

BGAAAAWKWKKKWKKWKWKWKK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200 days?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re -146 days from dead pool already!</p>
<p>BGAAAAWKWKKKWKKWKWKWKK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkolter</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>rkolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>June so far:

Average loss of 0.0319 feet / day
Total loss of 0.51 feet

Average loss of 1.06 thousand acre-feet of storage/day
Total loss of 17 thousand acre-feet of storage.

We're 6.36 feet above the low point in depth for the lake.  If we kept at this average loss, it would take 200 days to reach that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June so far:</p>
<p>Average loss of 0.0319 feet / day<br />
Total loss of 0.51 feet</p>
<p>Average loss of 1.06 thousand acre-feet of storage/day<br />
Total loss of 17 thousand acre-feet of storage.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re 6.36 feet above the low point in depth for the lake.  If we kept at this average loss, it would take 200 days to reach that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSO</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator>DSO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3651</guid>
		<description>The year to date total inflow (through June 13) is the third lowest in Lanier history.  Even 2007 had a better total inflow over the same period (14.3% better). 

Afternoon pop-up thunderstorms like the ones we've been getting may help to keep some lawns green but they won’t have a significant impact on Lanier inflow.  This is because soil moisture and groundwater levels in the Lanier drainage basin are so low that most of the rain that doesn’t fall directly into the lake never makes it to the lake. 

Even so, Atlanta will be just fine this year as long as the US Army Corps of Engineers doesn’t open the flood gates again this summer in its misguided and arguably illegal policy to support an obscenely inefficient Florida power plant and “endangered” Florida mussels of dubious environmental import.  

As a drought-busting weather pattern shift this year seems increasingly unlikely, the best hope for a Lanier recharge is to have a tropical storm or two come marching up out of the Gulf and dump copious quantities of rain over the Lanier drainage basin.  As oil speculators are happy to use any excuse to run up the price of crude, however, a tropical storm or a former hurricane that comes our way via the Gulf could well prove to be both a blessing and a curse.

– DSO –</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year to date total inflow (through June 13) is the third lowest in Lanier history.  Even 2007 had a better total inflow over the same period (14.3% better). </p>
<p>Afternoon pop-up thunderstorms like the ones we&#8217;ve been getting may help to keep some lawns green but they won’t have a significant impact on Lanier inflow.  This is because soil moisture and groundwater levels in the Lanier drainage basin are so low that most of the rain that doesn’t fall directly into the lake never makes it to the lake. </p>
<p>Even so, Atlanta will be just fine this year as long as the US Army Corps of Engineers doesn’t open the flood gates again this summer in its misguided and arguably illegal policy to support an obscenely inefficient Florida power plant and “endangered” Florida mussels of dubious environmental import.  </p>
<p>As a drought-busting weather pattern shift this year seems increasingly unlikely, the best hope for a Lanier recharge is to have a tropical storm or two come marching up out of the Gulf and dump copious quantities of rain over the Lanier drainage basin.  As oil speculators are happy to use any excuse to run up the price of crude, however, a tropical storm or a former hurricane that comes our way via the Gulf could well prove to be both a blessing and a curse.</p>
<p>– DSO –</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicken Little</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/20080613/inflow-to-lanier-reaching-record-lows/#comment-3647</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantawatershortage.com/?p=270#comment-3647</guid>
		<description>BIG PROBLEMS?

[shudder]

DEAD POOL?

BGGAAAAWWWKKKKKKKKK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIG PROBLEMS?</p>
<p>[shudder]</p>
<p>DEAD POOL?</p>
<p>BGGAAAAWWWKKKKKKKKK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
