How do we fix the problem?
Thursday, November 15th, 2007This is the big question. Some think prayer might help, but no one things it will fix the problem, and inspiring our kids to get more involved might be of value in 15 years. What about for now?
While we need a worst-case scenario plan in place (like in Lawrenceville), we also need to come up with two other plans:
1 - A short-term plan to get us into better shape for now.
2 - A long-term plan to fix it for good.
Our state government, to this point, is doing very little to help. The water restrictions are still way too lenient, and the water will still flow far too quickly from Lanier even with a 16% reduction (which I expected to hear about today, but so far there is no news).
How about a long-term solution? Jay Bookman at the AJC has written a nice Opinion piece that compares our situation to that of New York. The comparisons are quite surprising:
- Alabama, Florida, Georgia share the ACF watershed
- New York, Delaware, Pennsylvania and New Jersey share the Delaware River watershed
- Atlanta draws most of its water from the upper Chattahoochee
- New York draws most of its water from the upper Delaware watershed
- Atlanta has to worry about endangered mussels
- New York has to worry about endangered mussels
The difference is that they make it work, while we obviously can’t. The article lays out a fairly simple plan for fixing the problem:
Well, if the three states can’t agree on a resolution, maybe they can agree to submit to a process and a deadline. We should assemble a panel of outside experts, give them a year and a sufficient budget, and then make their final recommendations binding on all three states and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. You take out the politics and the posturing, and you get a decision based on the facts of the case.
